Christian
satire site The Babylon Bee received a terse warning from Facebook
this week after the "independent fact-checkers" at Snopes reported
that one of the site's humor articles was "false."
Adam
Ford, who runs The
Babylon Bee, was warned by Facebook that a recent satire
article about CNN "contains information disputed by (Snopes.com) an
independent fact checker." Repeat offenders, Ford was told, "will
see their distribution reduced and their ability to monetize and
advertized [sic] removed."

The
story in question pokes fun at CNN with the headline: "CNN Purchases
Industrial-Sized Washing Machine To Spin News Before Publication."
Anyone with even a sliver of a funny bone tucked away behind their
appendix would know that it wasn't a serious news piece, but, alas,
the humorless dolts at Snopes had
to take spell out the obvious.
Claim: CNN
invested in an industrial-sized washing machine to help their
journalists and news anchors spin the news before publication.
Rating:
False
"Although
it should have been obvious that the Babylon Bee piece was just a
spoof of the ongoing political brouhaha over alleged news media
'bias' and 'fake news,'" Snopes explained, "some readers missed that
aspect of the article and interpreted it literally."
Is
that so? Are we to believe there are people who really accepted at
face value the claim that CNN bought a literal washing machine to
literally "spin" their news? Highly doubtful. What more likely
happened is that some trigger-happy activists who don't appreciate
Christian and conservative satire reported The Babylon Bee to
Facebook, setting off an investigation by Snopes.
Snopes
conceded that "the site’s footer gives away the Babylon Bee’s nature
by describing it as 'Your Trusted Source For Christian News
Satire,'" and explained that the site "has been responsible for a
number of other (usually religious-themed) spoofs that
have been mistaken for real news articles."

Babylon
Bee's Adam Ford told PJM that this isn't the first time Snopes has
been "fact-checked" by Snopes. (You can read the other instances here.)
"But this is the first time Facebook has used that to threaten us
with reduced reach and demonetization," Ford said. "Also it seems
that anyone who clicked on the article got a notice that it was
'disputed.'"
Babylon
Bee's Adam Ford told PJM that this isn't the first time Snopes has
been "fact-checked" by Snopes. (You can read the other instances here.)
"But this is the first time Facebook has used that to threaten us
with reduced reach and demonetization," Ford said. "Also it seems
that anyone who clicked on the article got a notice that it was
'disputed.'"
He
said they also reduced the image size on the Facebook card after
it was flagged, which "probably stamped out the reach" of the
article.
While
on the surface this may seem like nothing more than a silly
misunderstanding or overreaction on the part of Snopes and
Facebook, it's important to view the warning in the context of
conservative groups and individuals being removed from Facebook
and other social media outlets at an alarming rate. Facebook
claims that they're in the process of hiring thousands of
fact-checkers along with "professional"
fact-checking organizations that oh, by
the way, happen to lean left.
This
past December PolitiFact discussed its partnership with Facebook
and explained how it works. "Our partnership with Facebook is
part of a push by the social media company to clean up its news
feed and become a more trustworthy platform," PolitiFact's Aaron
Sharackman wrote. "Facebook introduced a new tool after the
2016 campaign that allows users to mark a post as a 'false news
story,' and if enough do, the post is sent to fact-checkers like
PolitiFact, Snopes and Factcheck.org."
Sharackman
continued:
If
the fact-checkers find the story to be "false," a warning label is
attached to the original post in Facebook’s news feed, and
Facebook’s algorithm makes it more difficult for the disputed post
to spread virally.
PolitiFact
has been doing that work for a year now, and we have attached
that false label to at least 1,722 individual URLs. That’s
nearly five articles debunked a day, every day for a year.
Factcheck.org,
PolitiFact, and Snopes all have reputations for being biased in
favor of liberals, so it's no wonder Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg,
a flaming liberal himself, is relying heavily on these
organizations to be arbiters of truth in the Facebook
universe. The company that utterly
failed at keeping Russian bots from interfering in the 2016
election now has apparently set its sights
on conservative websites.
Follow
me on Twitter @pbolyard
-
Snopes
invested in a high-capacity dipshit factory.
Rating:
True
-
I
think this is worth a t-shirt. Walk around all day
and see if I get a warning from facebook...will
they shut me down? Cut off my revenue?
Where
is P.J. O'Rourke when you need him....
"If
we're looking for the source of our troubles, we
shouldn't test people for drugs, we should test
them for stupidity, ignorance, greed and love of
power."
-
...&
lacking a sense of humor (which allows you to
laugh @ yourself)...
-
P.
J. O'Rourke came out for Hillary. To Hell with
him.
-
Will
Snopes and Facebook do the same for any liberal
satire piece from The Onion? Yeah...that's what I
thought.
-
How
about when liberals use "satire" to portray
the violence against conservatives? "Oh, we
didn't mean someone should actually kill
Trump.. it was a JOKE"...
-
The
digital brown shirts of the left have
virtually fire bombed
another ideological opponent.
All
hail the Global Socialist order!
where the only freedom available
is the freedom it's fascist programmed
algorithm allows.
-
FAKEbook
Never
have - never will !
..
.
-
Who
is fact checking Snopes?
-
Democrat
National Committee
-
Reminds
me of when the dumb asses at Wapo fact checked if
there was actually a red button in the oval office
to launch nukes.
-
LOL
that Snopes is considered a "fact-checker"
-
facebook's
days are numbered. The controversy is what
drives their readership. If they're going to
silence one side, it merely becomes an echo
chamber which interests no one.
-
No.
Liberals don't mind echo chambers. That's
why they want to shut everyone up who
disagrees with them. Facebook would just
become their utopia.
-
Use
Facebook and post
the news ignored by the MSM.
-
ever
see a picture of the dork brigade that runs
SNOPES?
-
Ever
seen a picture of the dork that runs Facebook?
-
Isn't
it no longer a brigade? I seem to recall it
ended in an ugly divorce when the husband
embezzled company money to spend on hookers
and blow and got caught.
-
Wow,
leftist site snopes selected as the arbiter of
truth. Better to just avoid faecesbook.
-
I
deleted my page months ago!
-
Snopes
is actually awful. I mean it is often factually
inaccurate. It is driven by far leftist activists
who insist on stamping everything with their spin
and needs to be discredited as an "independent"
fact checker.
-
But
Snopes IS "independent." They're independent
of facts, reality, and lack of bias.
-
LOLOLOLOL
They
will also threaten National Lampoon and Mad
Magazine...
-
If
National Lampoon were still around, it would
rank at the top of Facebook's "Index
Expurgitorius".
-
Only
in our liberal clown world would this be done.
Facebook has become DisgraceBook.
-
It
will fade away some day like all fads.
-
Snopes.com....aka...a
300 lb. disgusting libtard woman and her 7 cats.
-
What
part of Satire are they confused about: the use of
humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose
and criticize people's stupidity or vices,
particularly in the context of contemporary
politics and other topical issues.
-
Poor
libs.
It's
all unraveling.
-
-
It
is no wonder that the liberal Snopes site and
Facebook cannot distinguish between truth and lies
when they confuse an obvious humorous satirical
spoof with real news. This should bring a
skeptical ear when listening to their drivel.
-
no
one likes to be made to resemble a fool .....
so by pretending it wasn't satire gave them an
out!
-
It
seems that this so-called 'independent'
fact-checker now controls Facebook's
content....does Zuckerberg realize that he gave
such control to someone else, or is he intending
to buy Snopes!!!
I
don't know anything about the Bumble Bee website
but I do know that Snopes is run by a Leftwing
adherent.
-
Libs
seem to have a problem with reality.
Libs
are reality deniers.
-
When
enough people wake up and care about what is going
on, they will realize that social media monsters
Facebook, Twitter, and the rest are anti free
speech, un American fascists. Wait , that'll never
happen, we all use Facebook every day like a
THOUSAND times a day. They got you folks, they got
you.
-
Let's
stop the nonsense ... The Constitution
guarantees the Right of Free Speech ONLY
against (unreasonable implied) Government
impingement. Private citizens - including
companies, have the right to say almost
anything or prevent others from using their
facilities to push private agendas.
Recourse
is based in laws imposing monetary damages for
defamation or privacy violations.
-
The
internet was created by taxpayer dollars
(i.e., public funding). So there is a
legal argument for applying the First
Amendment to any company using the
internet.
-
They
also gave Hustler a warning because Snopes said
the scratch and sniff issues didn't really smell
like what they claimed to smell like...
-
Snopes
has about as much credibility as the Southern
Poverty Law Center -- zero. When will Peter
Thiel and other Libertarians/Conservatives
create web sites to compete with YouTube, Google
and other bastions of the radical left?
-
Thiel
is not on our side. As of this second,
Palantir is logging what we say to be used
against us by the police state if necessary...
-
Thanks
for the heads-up. Do you have more
information -- namely, and objective
sources -- on this? Thanks.
-
I
wouldn't mind seeing a list of those 1,722 "false"
sites. A tally of their political orientations
would probably be quite instructive.
-
And
visiting them might be a lot more entertaining
than spending time on FB!
-
Fact-checking
exposes the facts.
Rating:
False
-
Facebook
Boycott starts with me TODAY! Let's Paaarrty...
-
My
Boycott started 70 years ago ... It is
possible to survive without using "Social"
media.
-